Apartheid is Alive and Well in Araby

apartheidBy Victor Sharpe, American Thinker
 
We stand in the midst of a new round of Israel-bashing called by the organizers of “Israel Apartheid Week.” Those doing the bashing are busy turning logic on its head. For them, up is down, day is night, and right is wrong. The collected hatemongers of the radical Left allied with the terminally hate-filled Muslim world, their ranks filled with empty-headed and gullible drones, are combining to shriek misplaced support for an Arab people calling themselves Palestinians, who, they allege, are suffering from apartheid. They make this false charge by slandering the Jewish state, equating it with what was once the South African apartheid regime.

According to the upside-down world of the “hate Israel” crowd, Arabs are separated from Jews within Israel just as the black Africans were segregated from the whites within South Africa. This is where facts retreat into the fantasy world one finds within the Thousand and One Arabian Nights.
 
The real apartheid that exists in the Middle East can be found not in Israel, but within the territories currently occupied by the Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority and the Hamas-occupied Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Arabs ban all Jews from living amongst them. Any Jews found are summarily murdered in cold blood. This is sanctioned by Fatah and Hamas, who both delight in describing the Arab terrorist thugs as heroes — even naming streets and town squares in their honor. Any Arabs found to have sold property to Jewish purchasers are summarily executed – often in the public squares and streets of Palestinian Arab settlements.
 
The geographical territory known as Palestine has, of course, never existed as an independent, sovereign nation in all of human history, and certainly never as an Arab state. The current territory within the Palestinian Authority and the Gaza Strip formed integral parts of the ancestral and biblical Jewish homeland. Indeed, the Palestinian Authority sits upon the very Jewish heartland of Judea and Samaria, known now by its Jordanian name, the West Bank.
 
The vast territory east of the River Jordan, now called the Kingdom of Jordan, includes large tracts of land that also formed part of the biblical Jewish and tribal lands. But now that same vast territory, which extends eastwards to Iraq, north to Syria, and south to Saudi Arabia (dwarfing tiny Israel in size), is also closed by the Jordanian authorities to Jews, who may not live within its borders upon pain of death. In contrast, Arabs, who make up 20% of the overall Israeli population, may live within the reconstituted Jewish state as citizens enjoying equal rights with justice for all.
 
The Jordanian regime instituted a law in 1954 prohibiting Jews from living in Jordan. They did this by conferring citizenship to all former residents of geographical Palestine — except Jewish ones. Israel’s population contains Jews who are white, black, brown, and yellow. It is not an apartheid state based on racial differences or concepts of racial purity and impurity. Under apartheid South Africa, blacks were not citizens of the country and were not permitted to vote. Yet the loony Left, allied with the hate-filled Islamic world, continues to accuse Israel of a mythical apartheid system while ignoring the Arab and Muslim perpetrators of the actual apartheid that so clearly exists in the Kingdom of Jordan, in the Palestinian Authority, and within the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.  

The tsunami of anti-Jewish bigotry and malice sweeping the universities in America and Europe is desolating. The boycotts of Israel generated from within academia are built upon a fraudulent ethos of Arab distortions and outright lies, yet thy are willingly accepted by gullible students and faculty alike. It seems that the intellectuals who utter their elitist drivel within the corridors of academe are all too often seduced by novelties. But what it sadly, and so often, reveals is an undeniable truth that intellectualism does not automatically confer intelligence or intelligent behavior.
 
It would be refreshing if the same students, professors, and assorted Israel-bashers could learn how the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians have created for themselves what can be described as anti-history. So insanely set are they upon a destructive denial of Jewish patrimony that these same Palestinian Arabs have created for themselves a fraudulent narrative denying even the existence of the Jewish Temples on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount — despite the overwhelming archaeological evidence of Jewish civilization and history in the land spanning millennia. This is why Palestinian Prime Minister Fayad called out the Palestinian rent-a-mob to riot in the streets of Hebron and Jerusalem after Israel declared the ancient Jewish holy sites of the Machpela Cave in Hebron and the tomb of the biblical matriarch, Rachel, as national heritage sites.
 
In Genesis 23:13, we read about the first Jew, Abraham, purchasing land in Hebron from Ephron the Hittite as a burial plot for his wife, Sarah. His son Isaac and grandson Jacob are also buried there along with their wives — the Jewish patriarchs and matriarchs. But this upsets the Palestinian Arabs because the Jewish tombs are within the territory they demand for a state — for them, these Jewish sites are an inconvenient truth. Another Jewish holy place in what the world likes to call the West Bank is Joseph’s tomb in Nablus, or what was once biblical Jewish Shechem. The good Palestinian Arabs recently desecrated the ancient tomb, filling it with rubbish and excrement, to prevent Jewish prayers and pilgrimage at the site. These are manifestations of apartheid — Arab style.
 
With breathtaking absurdity, the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians make claims of historical and lineal descent from the extinct Canaanites and Philistines. They have bred several generations of children in kindergartens imbued with such frightening nonsense, attended by a love of barbarism and a culture of death. They have been encouraged in this by the corrupt neighboring Arab leaders, who for some sixty years have stigmatized them as refugees yet at the same time have barred them from living within their own basket-case countries.  
 
From this horrific Palestinian-Arab sectarianism, the culture of death has developed along with an Islamic refusal to ever make a true and lasting peace with the non-Muslim state known as Israel. Indeed, for the Jewish population and for the subsequent State of Israel, there has been relentless Arab terror since the 1920s.
 
Consider the massacre of Jewish civilians by their Arab neighbors in Judaism’s second-holiest city, Hebron — the city that not only houses the Jewish burial place of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but which King David first made his capital. That Arab atrocity took place in 1929 during the British Mandate occupation. For all those anti-Israel bigots who scream against Israeli occupation, they should know that the so-called West Bank and the Gaza Strip were not ‘occupied’ at that time. Indeed, the Jewish state was not reborn until nineteen years later, in 1948 — yet Arabs were murdering and terrorizing Jews all those years before. They should ask themselves why, after the Israel-Arab war of 1948, when the Egyptians occupied the Gaza Strip and the Jordanians occupied the so-called West Bank, neither Egypt nor Jordan felt the need to create a new Arab state to be called Palestine. Neither did the Arab residents demand it. Only after Israel defeated Arab aggression in 1967 and liberated the territories did the Arab world begin to demand the creation of a 23rd Arab state. They should also know that today, some 98% of Arabs calling themselves Palestinians live in both the Arab Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip and the rival Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority. There is, in reality, no occupation. So what do they mean when they rant and rave about Israeli occupation, unless it is a call for the very extinction of Israel itself?  
 
There is no such thing as Israeli apartheid against the Arabs. But there most certainly is Arab apartheid imposed upon Jews, who are denied the right to live amongst Arabs even in the ancestral and biblical Jewish heartland, which is occupied and controlled today by the Palestinian Authority and the Islamist Hamas.
 
It truly is an upside-down world, viewed now through a window so terribly distorted as to bewilder and confuse untold millions. It is much more than an Arab-Israel conflict over territory; it is much deeper than that. It is an Islamic refusal to accept a reconstituted Jewish homeland where once the Muslim foot trod triumphal. The very fact that the Palestinian Arabs, who are overwhelmingly Muslim, will never accept a tiny Jewish state within the enormous Arab landmass that stretches from Mauritania in the west to Iraq in the east is clear and present evidence of Muslim and Arab apartheid. This empirical fact must be understood.
 
In that context, I am reminded that it was the Indian leader Mahatma Ghandi who said, “While Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsees, and Jews, along with several million adherents of an animistic religion, all coexisted in relative harmony, one religion that would not accept compromise stood out from the rest: Islam.”
 
It would be an enlightening and seminal moment in these first years of the 21st century if the eyes and ears of the Israel-bashers could be opened with the realization that they have targeted the wrong nation, and that apartheid is alive and well within the Arab world.
 
Victor Sharpe is a freelance writer and author of several published books including Volumes One and Two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state. 

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/apartheid_is_alive_and_well_in.html at March 03, 2010 – 06:15:39 AM CST

Firepan in the woodpile

mahbouhby Stan Goodenough

In that day I will make the governors of Judah like a firepan in the woodpile, and like a fiery torch in the sheaves; they shall devour all the surrounding peoples on the right hand and on the left, but Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place—Jerusalem. (Zechariah 12:6)

World leaders are beside themselves.

Israel – it is universally reported – sent an intelligence team to take out one of the Jewish people’s many enemies. The team used fraudulent passports and other people’s identities to carry out the operation.

Hamas’ murderer and senior member Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was found dead in his Dubai hotel room January 20.

According to first reports, he had died after “a long illness.” Hamas itself tied his death to “a medical issue.” Then, when his body arrived in Damascus, Syrian authorities called and told his brother that Mabhouh had been “assassinated by Israel.”

Almost a full month after his passing, Dubai police suddenly announced that they are “99 percent certain” the Mossad – Israel’s version of the CIA (only with a more impressive track record) – had eliminated him.

The Mossad – the Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations – does not comment on such allegations.

After a full year of worldwide demonization since Israel launched a self-defensive military operation against Hamas in Gaza, the international community was poised to seize the accusation and run with it.

On February 21, the British newspaper – the Sunday Times – reported as fact that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered the killing.

Outrage is boomeranging round the world. The United Kingdom and France have expressed their hypocritical horror that Israeli spies would use Irish and French passports and false identities to perpetrate such an action. Israeli diplomats are being called onto the carpet to “explain.”

A few comments:

•As Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman stated Monday, the Arab states are always blaming Israel for all sorts of things – including perpetrating deliberate massacres of Arab civilians and stealing Arab lands.
•All nations – including England and France – employ spying techniques that break the laws of the countries they are spying on.
•As far as Israel is concerned, Mahbouh was an enemy combatant and a legitimate target. Hamas is in a state of war against Israel. Mahbouh – according to the terror organization and according to his own brother – was personally responsible for the kidnapping and killing of Israeli soldiers. Untold is the number of Israelis who have lost their lives as a direct result of this man’s actions in the Hamas.
•If Mossad agents did execute Mahbouh, it was not an act of murder but an act of warfare. Dubai, by allowing known terrorists and killers freely in and out of its borders, has no leg to stand on in protesting the movement in and out of its borders of other “undesirables” like intelligence agents.
•And my own personal view: Israel should train and send its agents after every properly identified and accurately accused foe. It should take out killers of its people in Cairo and Damascus, Dubai and Baghdad, Tehran and Beirut, England and France, Canada and the United States – wherever they may be.
•Let no murderer of Jews feel safe anywhere in this world.

In any case, as far as Lebanon and Syria, Iran and Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are concerned; Israel is set to do a lot more damage than merely remove individual foes here and there.

The Islamic-Arab world – specifically those states around Israel – is the woodpile. Judah’s governors – that is the Jewish leadership – are the firepan. The fate of the woodpile is to be devoured.

So says the prophet Zechariah, in the context of the very days in which we are living.

It’s going to happen. And when it does – the world is going to have an apoplectic fit.

My meeting with a PLO negotiator from Jericho

By Bill Koenig

I noticed at the Metro train stop by the White House on Tuesday, January 18 a newspaper called The Washington Diplomat that focuses on the very large diplomatic community here in Washington.

It captured my interest because January’s lead article was entitled “PLO Going Nowhere?”

I started reading the article to get the Palestinian perspective. The person being interviewed was Maen Rashid Areikat, the new head representative of the Palestine Liberation Organization to the United States — headquartered in Washington.

I thought to myself: That name sounds familiar. I looked through the article for his biography to see if he was who I thought he was. Sure enough, he was.

On my return flight from Israel to Dallas in the first week of January 2000, I was upgraded to Business Class on my oversold British Airways flight from Tel Aviv to London. The Lord had arranged for me to sit next to Maen Rashid Areikat of the PLO’s Negotiations Affairs Department.

Maen told me he was on the way to London for some backroom negotiations with the Israelis.

We talked for the entire length of the five-hour flight. We discovered that we had both graduated from Arizona State University. Maen also received his MBA at Western International University in Phoenix. He talked about how he loved living in Arizona.

Maen is one of the nicest people I’ve ever met — a really good guy.

I enjoyed discussing areas of mutual interest and, especially, hearing his perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and what it is like for him and his family to live in the Palestinian territories.

He said he was born in Jericho and attended Catholic schools. He spoke with much sincerity about wanting his family to live in peace and security. He showed no hatred or anger towards Israel.

I thought: If this man were leading the Palestinians, there would be an agreement with Israel such as the ones Israel achieved with Jordan’s King Hussein and Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat.

When I read his article, I saw his very sincere and hopeful side. While he seems totally removed from the radical side of the PLO as led by Yasser Arafat, Fatah and Hamas, I also see a person who doesn’t address the fact that Hamas is the greatest threat to his dream of his living in peace and security.

We know Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas redirected millions of dollars of foreign aid to their bank accounts and their cronies. This led to Hamas becoming a force in Palestinian politics, when they met the social needs of the Palestinians while gaining great favor, which led to their capturing 74 of 132 seats in the Palestinian Parliament in the January 2006 election.

As we continue to hear and read of the ongoing tensions between Fatah and Hamas, we realize that Maen’s job is extremely difficult.

I will contact Maen soon. I want to share with him once again the biblical perspective of what is taking place in Israel. He is the kind of guy who will listen. Who knows? He may be the Arab leader who signs the Daniel 9:27 covenant.

The following is the link to Maen’s interview and my final comments:

With widening Israeli-Palestinian gulf,
 PLO envoy clings to statehood dream (Larry Luxner, The Washington Diplomat)

Click here for the full article.

Final comments: This is a Palestinian perspective from a man who was 4 years old in 1967 and whose father was a Palestinian activist.

The key point is that Maen sincerely wants his family and the rest of the Palestinians to live in peace. That dream has been stopped due to a corrupt Palestinian government and Palestinian terror groups.

Furthermore, “Palestine” was not all Arab: It was the home of the Jews of Palestine and the Arabs of Palestine.

Yasser Arafat and the terror groups have done great harm to the Palestinian people. Palestinians are living in refugee camps in many Arab countries and being treated as third- and fourth-class citizens. They have been pawns in the peace process. Many Palestinians would prefer to live in Israeli-controlled cities, not those managed by the Palestinians.

Hamas, the political party that is in control of the Palestinian Parliament, will not recognize Israel’s right to existence and is determined to have full control over all Palestinian property, which includes Ramallah.

Israel is not the Palestinians’ problem and never has been the Palestinians’ problem. Rather, it is their corrupt leadership and refusal to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist. They can complain and call for actions against Israel, but it will never solve the Palestinians’ own political problems.

Israel’s “Non-Jewish Jews”

By  Shelley Neese

When new immigrants (olim) arrive to Israel, the first step in the absorption process is attending ulpan—an intensive Hebrew language course for adults.  It is an Israeli right of passage.  When I moved to Beer Sheva in 2000 on a student visa, I electively enrolled in an ulpan at the local Mercaz Klita (absorption center).  In a class of twenty-one students there were eighteen from the former Soviet Union states, two from Venezuela, and myself.  Everyone except me had immigrated to Israel as a Jewish citizen.

For a field trip the class visited the old port city of Jaffa, just south of Tel Aviv.  After an organized tour and Hebrew lesson we broke off on our own to sightsee.  I wandered over to the beautiful Franciscan St. Peter’s Church where, much to my surprise, three of my Russian-speaking classmates were already kneeling in prayer and making the sign of the cross.  When they noticed my wide eyes, they gave me an amused shrug as if to say “this is no secret.”  These classmates were my gateway into the complex world of Israel’s Russian-speaking Christians.  But they were by no means my last. 

The Influx

Israel has seen several waves of Russian immigration as Jews, under the Soviet Union, were cut off from Jewish learning and were regularly subjected to state-sponsored anti-Semitism.  Zionists were accused of treason and denied the right to relocate to Israel.  In 1970, a window opened as the Soviet Union briefly bowed to international pressure, lifting their tight quotas on exit visas.  Jews clamored to get out, thousands moving to Israel, before the window closed again.  The floodgates opened completely, however, with the collapse of the Soviet Union.  From 1989 to 1993, 800,000 immigrants came to Israel—the largest aliya movement since the creation of the modern Jewish state.  (Aliya, literally meaning “going up,” is the Hebrew word for immigrating to Israel.)

In 2008, there are 1.3 million Russian speakers in Israel, out of a total population of 6.5 million.  As it stands, more Jews have immigrated to Israel from the former Soviet Union than from any other country in the world.  A significant portion of these olim—as many as 500,000—are not considered Jewish according to orthodox laws (halacha) and are ignorant of Jewish tradition.  In my ulpan class this was exemplified by the stunned silence when our teacher asked about the holiday of Passover. 
The exact number of Christian olim is complicated because many maintain a low religious profile.  According to the Israeli Bureau of Statistics, 23,000 Russian-speaking immigrants are self-classified as Christian.  Thousands of others, who are probably Christian, declare their religion as “unclassified” or “other.”  The unofficial count of Christian Russian immigrants is around 80,000.

The Controversy

The Law of Return in Israel states that any Jew can become a citizen of Israel.  Under the “grandchild clause” in the Law of Return, anyone with a Jewish grandparent also qualifies for aliya.  The idea is that since the Nazis targeted someone who was one-quarter Jewish for extermination, he or she should be granted protection by the Jewish state.  In accordance with this clause and its extension to non-Jewish family members, Israel’s Ministry of Interior says that 15% of all Russian immigrants during the 1990s came as non-Jews.   In recent years this percentage has risen to 58%. 

Restricting the Law of Return to curb non-Jewish immigration is a controversial topic in Israel.  Orthodox proponents, like the political party Shas, believe it is time to cancel the “grandchild clause.”  They worry that Israel will lose its Jewish identity if it does not stop the entry of immigrants who are not Jewish by halacha.  Opponents to any change in the Law of Return argue that it is the foundational principle of the state and that the law should not cater to the Orthodox.  Plus on a practical level immigration helps tilt the demographics of the region in Israel’s favor. 

The Israeli authorities hope most of the immigrants who are not halachically Jewish assimilate into the Jewish majority or participate in one of the several conversion programs for olim.  Shuvu is the nationwide school system with an enriched Jewish curriculum that teaches young immigrants Jewish traditions.  The IDF has its own “friendly” conversion process for Russian-speaking soldiers.  They offer courses in Judaism and Zionism and have seen over a 15% conversion rate among immigrant soldiers.  Outside the military, however, the conversion process is much more restrictive with only half of one percent of immigrants converting each year.
The Jewish factor

Immigrants from the former Soviet Union—be they Christian or secular—have in a short period dramatically changed the cultural and religious backdrop of Israel.  It is no longer difficult to find grocers selling pork, and at Christmas there is an abundant selection of tacky Santas and plastic ornaments.  The IDF is currently providing no small number of New Testaments at the request of Christian immigrants who prefer it to the Hebrew text for their swearing-in. 

Russian Christians have created a new religious minority in Israel.  Like any immigrant population the first generation has struggled to assimilate, but the second generation has been absorbed into the flexible definition of what it means to be Israeli.  They speak Hebrew, watch Israeli television, serve in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), and marry other Israelis.  Some have converted to orthodox Jewry but many have integrated socially while retaining their Christian faith.  Though they are unaffiliated with Judaism, they do affiliate with the Israeli-Jewish culture and do not oppose Judaism’s place in public life.  They are sometimes referred to by Israelis as the “non-Jewish Jews.” 
 
For many of these “non-Jewish Jews,” serving in the IDF is an opportunity to prove their patriotism.  The casualty rate for Russian immigrants is around three times higher than the norm because many of the immigrants volunteer for the more dangerous army units.  In the Second Lebanon War, nearly one-quarter of those who received medals of valor were Russian-speaking immigrants and almost the same proportion received military burials. 

Despite their patriotism, the Christian olim experience a certain level of institutional discrimination. Israel’s Orthodox Chief Rabbinate controls issues of “personal status,” such as marriage, divorce, and burial.  There is no option for a civil marriage ceremony if citizens are not halachic Jews.  They have to leave the country if they want to marry or use an approved Christian clergyman.  Furthermore, non-halachic Jews are not supposed to be buried in Jewish cemeteries, even if they are IDF soldiers who died in combat.

The Sensitivities

The subject of Russian Christian immigrants in Israel is a sensitive one that most are hesitant to discuss because there are still many obstacles to overcome.  But for a country that prides itself on its complicated ethnic makeup, Israel is certainly capable of finding that delicate balance that will protect the Jewish character of the state and still ensure the religious freedoms of this new Israeli Christian minority.  After worshiping in a two-thirds Russian speaking congregation in Beer Sheva for several years I rejoice in the vibrancy the olim have brought to the Israeli-Christian community.  Personally, I can no longer imagine an Israel without the extra cultural religious layer that the Russian immigrants provide.  I have my ulpan classmates to thank that I still to this day speak Hebrew with a hint of a Russian accent.

Shelley Neese is managing editor for the The Jerusalem Connection Report.

Not one more Inch

By Victor Sharpe

“Let me tell you about land for peace.”

I remember once seeing a cartoon of a Native American chief looking wistfully towards the distant horizon where once his ancestral homeland lay. He was speaking to a stranger about the peace treaties he made that were all dishonored by American officials. The caption read: “Let me tell you about land for peace.”

With this in mind, and with the painful knowledge of Israel’s past “land for peace” fiascos, I penned an article, published in American Thinker, called “First Two-State Solution is 87 Years Old”. I felt it necessary to remind the world how, in 1921/22, the British Colonial Office had arbitrarily abrogated the promises made by Britain under the 1917 Balfour Declaration – of assisting the creation in Mandatory Palestine of a Jewish National Home. The British government broke its promise by tearing away all of the Mandate territory east of the River Jordan and giving it to the Arab Hashemite tribe. No Jews were allowed thereafter to live within the new Arab territory, which is now known as the Kingdom of Jordan. It became, and remains, judenrein, Arab style.

Now the modern Jewish state – ever obliged through international pressure to take risks by agreeing to “land for peace”, but never, ever receiving peace – is faced with the relentless continuation of the plan to divide yet again what remains of Eretz Yisrael, the Land of Israel, by now tearing away its Biblical and ancestral homeland. This is the very Biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria known throughout the world by its Jordanian Arab name, the West Bank. Land for peace and the two-state solution thus combine in a deathly embrace to force Israel into agreeing to permit within its borders the creation of an Arab terror state to be called Palestine: the 23rd Arab state.

In my work as a freelance writer and author, I am constantly forced to battle both Israel-bashers in the media as well as those Jews who are sadly willing to abandon their people’s spiritual and physical patrimony – the same foolish ones who support J Street and the so-called New Israel Fund (NIF). They do so in the deluded belief that by giving away the land, a full and lasting peace with the Muslim Arabs will descend upon embattled Israel like manna from heaven. But a reading of the Koran and the Hadith is all that is necessary to understand that Islam will never accept a non-Muslim state in land previously conquered in the name of Allah. Peace is nothing but a mirage in the desert.

It is necessary to retell the story of the redemption in June 1967, when Divine providence and Jewish patriotism combined to free Judea, Samaria, Gaza and the Golan Heights from alien occupation. But why must it be required to reiterate again and again that Israel did not capture land from another people? It always was the Jewish people’s very own land; and it returned to its native people.

How long must the patriots and lovers of Zion endure Israeli governments, which turn a blind eye to the creation of new Arab facts springing up on Judean and Samarian soil in the form of an Arab house here and a villa there? How long must they wait before a nationalist and patriotic Israeli government emerges that withstands foreign pressures; never again sending its police and troops, like thieves in the night, to destroy Jewish villages (I never use the pejorative English word, “settlements”) upon that same Judean and Samarian land?
Will Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu withstand such foreign pressure? Will he have learned the terrible lesson of the fraudulent Oslo Peace Accords, which predictably morphed into the Oslo War with its thousands of dead and maimed Jewish civilians. Will he have learned from his earlier abandonment of Hebron, the city of Judaism’s patriarchs and matriarchs, to the Muslim Arabs? Unless a miraculous change of heart occurs, I fear his self-imposed freeze on Jewish home building will remain in force, under vicious pressure from Barack Hussein Obama, while Arab housing continues feverishly concreting over the hills and valleys of the biblical heartland.

Nationalist and patriotic Israelis, along with Jewish and non-Jewish supporters in the Diaspora, may therefore see the new government, with its inclusion of Ehud “peace at any price” Barak as Defense Minister, continuing the lamentable policy of “land for peace”; whereby, Israel gives away its land but never receives peace; followed inevitably with the direst of all tragedies – a second “two-state solution.”

How long before the majority of politicians in the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) finally accept that Jews have returned permanently to their ancestral and Biblical land, a land which presently stretches from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River – a distance of less than 50 miles. How long before they realize that Israel must not be the only nation in the world perpetually forced to concede its homeland – the very special land given in eternal and divine Covenant by the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, King of Israel, Creator of the Universe – invisible and indivisible. How long before the cry is taken up: Not one more inch!

The threats are mounting against the Jewish state to an extent not seen since 1947. My own published books, volumes one and two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state, outline the relentless march of the enemies of Eretz Yisrael. Even today, a list of academics at American and overseas universities has been made available calling for a U.S. Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel and for a campaign called “End the Occupation.” http://www.endtheoccupation.org/groups.php.

Despite Israel no longer administering Gaza, and allowing for the fact that over 98% of the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians are now living under the control of the Palestinian Authority, the denizens of ‘lower learning’ throughout academia still falsely describe the Palestinian Arabs as living under Israeli occupation. Intellectual pursuits clearly do not confer intelligence.

The manner in which Israel may yet prevail is for it, therefore, to resist Arab and Islamist aggression from a position of relative territorial strength. Hebron has already been lost to those Arabs who call themselves Palestinians (save for a tiny and ever threatened Jewish enclave in the holy city). The Arabs have no interest in Israel’s survival; rather, the opposite. In return for a reduction in American support, if it has to come to that, Israel would be wise to keep Judea and Samaria. Keep the Golan. Even restore to itself parts of the Gaza Strip.
 
The physical and spiritual homeland is strength. Judaism, Zionism, Jerusalem – all are one and the same. Israeli ambassador (Ret.) Yoram Etinger, constantly issues demographic facts showing that the Jewish population is growing far faster in the territories than is the Arab population and that between the Mediterranean and the River Jordan the Arab population is vastly overstated by some two million inhabitants.

So will the Jewish state remain true to the Covenant? Will it no longer concede one inch of covenanted land? Will that resolve extend to an undivided Jerusalem? Will there be a firm and unyielding rejection of yet another two-state solution? Will the people finally say no to those elites who betrayed their trust by giving away the precious homeland in return for the bauble known as the Oslo Peace Prize? The questions remain, but if Israel continues to hark unto the siren calls of a fraudulent peace, it may yet usher in another Final Solution for the remnant of the Jewish people and for the reconstituted Jewish state.

Remember, it is always infinitely preferable to fight from a position of territorial strength, buoyed by spiritual certitude, than to be forced to battle for survival after yet more of the homeland has been given away in return for nothing.
Remember the words of that Native American.

Victor Sharpe is a freelance writer and author of several books including volumes one and two of Politicide – The attempted murder of the Jewish state.

The Changing Borders of Israel

Victor SharpeBy Victor Sharpe
 
From the earliest Biblical days the boundaries of the ancestral Jewish homeland expanded and shrank time and time again. But even during periods when the homeland was under alien occupation, the Jews managed to sustain, in whatever numbers they could, a physical presence. For Jews in the Diaspora the land remained forever with them as an unbroken bond.

The first Jew, Abraham, was called by God to leave Haran and travel to the Promised Land around 2000 BC. His journey began when he first left Ur (situated in today’s Iraq) and traveled to Haran and thence to Biblical Shechem in today’s Nablus, now a center of Arab terrorism in the Palestinian Authority territories.

Abraham journeyed onto Egypt because of famine throughout the land then known as Canaan. But before he left, he purchased a plot of land in Hebron from a Hittite where today the Cave of Machpela exists as the traditional burial ground of Abraham, his son Isaac, and grandson Jacob along with their wives, Sarah, Rebecca and Leah. These are the Jewish Patriarchs and Matriarchs of the Bible.

Concurrent draughts and famine forced Abraham’s descendants to find sanctuary and relief in Egypt. The Biblical story tells us of the Jewish nation’s eventual slavery by successive Pharaohs and the miraculous Exodus under the leader and lawgiver, Moses, who brought them back to the Promised Land around 1,225 BC. From this time onwards we see how many times the boundaries of the Jewish homeland have waxed and waned up unto the present day.

We should start at the borders of the land after its conquest by the Children of Israel under their general, Joshua, and its distribution amongst the Twelve Tribes. 

The tribes, which traced their individual history back to the sons of Jacob, were Manasseh, Ephraim, Asher, Naphtali, Zebulon, Issachar, Dan, Benjamin, Judah and Simeon. They received territory in what consists today of Israel along with Judea and Samaria (the West Bank). In addition, the tribes of Manasseh, Gad and Reuben also received vast areas of land east of the River Jordan, which today form part of the Hashemite Arab Kingdom of Jordan in which no Jews are permitted to live. Much of the territory adjoining the coastline was occupied in the south by the Philistines, known as the Sea Peoples, who it is believed originated in Crete. In the north the Phoenicians occupied the maritime lands.

Around 1000-925 BC, the subsequent Kingdoms of David and his son, Solomon, expanded their borders to encompass the Mediterranean (the Great Sea) coastline from central Sinai as far north as present day Akko, (Acre).  In the east, the borders extended to include present day Amman, the capital of Jordan, and Damascus in Syria. Indeed much of present day Syria was included within the borders of the Biblical Jewish kingdom.

In the south, the territory reached as far as today’s Eilat at the head of the modern day Gulf of Aqaba, but around 850 BC civil war broke out and the land was divided into two separate kingdoms, with Judah in the south and Israel in the north. The concomitant weakness allowed Moab and Edom to break away and a powerful new Empire, Assyria, in what is present day Iraq, began to threaten Israel from the north and east. 

I will bring a nation upon you from afar…it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation; a nation whose language you know not nor what they say.  And they will eat up your harvest and your bread, which your sons and daughters should eat; they will eat your flocks and your herds; they will  eat up your vines and your fig trees; they will impoverish your walled cities,  in which you trust, with the sword.  Nevertheless, I will not make a full end with you. Jeremiah 6, 17-18

Both Israel and Judah had shrunk to mere shadows of the glory they once were. As the Bible recounts, Israel finally succumbed to the awesome power of Assyria in 722 BC and her people were lost to history and passed into legend as the ten lost tribes of Israel.

Judah held on for over a hundred years but a new Empire arose, Babylon, which defeated its Assyrian rival and eventually moved against Judah. After a long siege, the Babylonians broke into Jerusalem, sacked the Temple and carried off the Jews to Babylon in 586 BC. 

In turn, Babylon, the greatest city of the ancient world, was conquered by the rising empire of Persia. Its king, Cyrus, proclaimed in 539 BC that the Jewish exiles could return to their ancient land and the cry was heard, “Return to Zion! Rebuild the Land of Israel.”

Not all the Jews returned. Many remained in Babylon and their descendants lived there for 2,500 years until the middle of the twentieth century, when they escaped from the cruel oppression of the Iraqi Arab government during Operation Ezra and Nehemiah – after the reconstituted State of Israel came into existence in 1948. But let us return to what the earlier Zionists of their day achieved when some 50,000 Jews left Babylon to restore their homeland.

In time, the Second Temple was built in Jerusalem and the land, now again named Judah, prospered. Unlike the early Persian kings, the later ones became more and more dictatorial. Persia was finally conquered by Greece.

Alexander the Great was particularly kind to his Jewish subjects and many Jews fought under his banner as he carved out his Greek empire. But, again, after his death, Alexander’s Ptolemaic Egyptian and Seleucid Syrian successors became increasingly difficult to live under.  The Jewish homeland fell under the control of the Hellenized King of Syria, Antiochus IV. He thought he was a god and called himself Epiphanes, which means “the manifest of God.” Antiochus demanded that the Jews worship him, give up their religion, and cease to keep the Sabbath holy. His cruelty and madness eventually forced the revolt of the heroic Jewish priest, Mattathias, and his five sons who are enshrined in history as the Maccabees.         

Against overwhelming odds, the revolt began in 167 BC and fierce battles were fought throughout Israel, Judea and Samaria. During the war, Syrian/Greek armies were thrown against the Jewish rebels but were defeated by the third son of Mattathias, Judah, who emerged as an extraordinary military leader and who went on to victories at Emmaus, Beth-Horon, and Beth-Zur. On the twenty-fifth day of the Hebrew month of Kislev, 165 BC, which usually falls in the month of December, the Maccabees, which means “hammerers,” liberated and restored the Temple – an act celebrated to this day during the Jewish festival of lights – Hanukah. 

The successor to the Maccabees, the Hasmonean dynasty extended the boundaries of Israel again to include territory almost reaching Damascus in the north and including large areas again of modern day Jordan in the east and as far southwest as Gaza and much of the northern coastline of Sinai.

In 63 BC, during rival claims to the Hasmonean throne, one of the claimants foolishly invited the looming empire of Rome to intercede on his behalf.  Rome, ever anxious to spread its influence, sent its general, Pompey, with an army to besiege Jerusalem and after three months the city fell.  Rome now effectively occupied the Jewish homeland, which in time became the Roman Province of Judea.

It is instructive to note that at the time of Pompey’s invasion there were three million Jews in Judea. Another four million lived in other parts of the Roman Empire and since the total population of the entire empire was no more than 70,000,000, one out of every ten Romans was of the Jewish faith. Jews today now number a mere thirteen million people out of a world population rapidly exceeding six billion. Over half of the world Jewish population now live in Israel.

Like the earlier Persian and Greek kings, the Roman procurators and governors inflicted onerous taxes on the people and began to dictate how their religion was to be practiced. The Jews finally rose up against the Roman legions in 66-73 AD. 

The Roman emperor Vespasian ordered his son, Titus, to finally re-conquer Judea and besiege its capital, Jerusalem. After an epic struggle with the defenders, Titus and his legions destroyed the Temple. The revolt continued until the Jewish defenders on the mountaintop fortress of Masada committed mass suicide rather than be taken as captive slaves to Rome.

Despite enormous casualties (estimates of 1,000,000 Jews killed) and countless numbers sent into slavery, the Jewish presence still remained strong in the homeland and a Second Revolt broke out against Roman occupation in 135 AD. The Jews fought under their charismatic leader, Shimon Bar-Kochba and defeated successive Roman legions sent against them. They restored their independence for three short years.

The Roman Emperor, Hadrian, finally crushed Judea and renamed the land Philistia, later Syria-Palaestina, finally known as Palestine, after the Philistines who had dominated parts of the Mediterranean coastline. This was a calculated insult to the Jews whose ancient enemy had been the Philistines. Palestine remained the geographical name of the area until modern times though it was never an independent state; certainly never an independent Arab state. 

However, even after Jewish independence in its Biblical and ancestral homeland was obliterated in name and deed, the Jews still managed to remain throughout much of the territories. Jerusalem had been converted into a pagan city named Aeolia Capitolina in which was erected a giant statue of the pagan god, Jupiter, in place of the Temple to the One God.

Though the land was lost to Jewish independence for the next two thousand years, Jews continued to yearn for a return to the Promised Land  and “Zion” the mountain that became a symbol for Jerusalem. 

In the seventh century, the Arabs invaded the homeland under the new banner of Islam. For successive periods after Hadrian’s bloody conquest, different alien invaders occupied the land including Byzantines, Persians, Arabs, Seljuks, Crusaders, Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, and the British. 

Though Jews remained in whatever numbers they could maintain, there was always a steady, albeit limited, infusion of Jews into the homeland fleeing persecution in Europe or from the Islamic world. For instance, during the Middle Ages, many Jewish rabbis and their disciples re-entered the land.  Larger numbers began to return in the mid-nineteenth century. Neglected and barren land was purchased at great cost from absentee landlords and agricultural schools and communities began to form under the Ottoman occupation. 

On November 2, 1917, Jewish hopes for a restored and independent homeland were raised by the British Foreign Minister, Lord Balfour, in what became known as the Balfour Declaration. Great Britain soon conquered all of Ottoman occupied Palestine and, after the First World War, the League of Nations gave Britain control of the Holy Land with a mandate to effect Jewish self-government and a national homeland. Shortly after Britain obtained the Mandate, she tore away all of the land east of the River Jordan and gave it to the Arab Hashemite tribe; thus denying Jewish rights in four fifths of the territory.

Most Arab leaders, at that time, acknowledged that they had no historical claims upon the Land of Israel. The area had never been home to an independent Arab state called “Palestine,” and even when it had come under the control of the invading Arab Empire in the seventh century, it had always remained an unimportant backwater. Since 1517, the land had been occupied by the non-Arab Turks.

In 1936, the British Peel Commission stated clearly that “if the Arabs were given independence in the enormous territories of the Middle East, they were willing to give “little Palestine” to the Jews.”  Little Palestine was now reduced to the one fifth of the Mandate or the tiny territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan – a mere 50 miles at its widest.

Arab intransigence grew as the years went by. In the end, the British gave up the struggle to keep the peace and in 1947 referred the matter to the United Nations, which voted to divide the much reduced area yet again into two states: one Arab, one Jewish. 

It would be wise for readers to purchase or obtain from their local libraries the remarkably clear and graphic books published by Sir Martin Gilbert, the official biographer of Sir Winston Churchill and now a Fellow at Merton College, Oxford. The two books are The Arab-Israel Conflict, Its History in Maps, and the Jewish History Atlas.

From 1917 to 1947, many different suggestions were offered for the boundaries of the geographical entity known as Palestine. Britain’s Colonial Office suggested plans that were to become inimical to the hoped for borders proposed by the Zionist Organization representing the aspirations of the Jews in the Diaspora. 

During the 1920s and 1930s, the Arabs rioted against the British Mandatory Authorities and, in the ensuing violence, many Jews were murdered.  In 1929, the ancient Jewish community in Hebron was slaughtered by their Arab neighbors and twenty three defenseless Jews were slaughtered and dismembered in one house alone. 

In 1936, an organized Arab campaign broke out and bands of armed Arabs inflicted heavy casualties on the British forces. Eighty Jews, mostly civilians, had been killed by the time the Arabs called off their “intifada” on October 12, 1936.

Britain tried to appease the Arabs by appointing a Royal Commission to look into the Mandate. The Peel Commission recommended a Jewish state and an Arab state with a British controlled corridor from Jaffa to Jerusalem.  The Jews reluctantly accepted; the Arabs totally rejected.

In 1937 more Arab rioting took place with yet more Jewish and Arab casualties. Many of the Arabs who sought peace and coexistence were murdered by their fellow Arabs because they were considered “collaborators” with the Jews. This same murderous activity continues in today’s Palestinian Authority and in Hamas occupied Gaza.

The Second World War broke out on September 3, 1939 and Britain, more than ever, needed the oil from the Arab Middle East to survive. Again, it chose to appease the Arabs and in 1940 began restricting Jewish land purchases. Before that, the infamous 1939 British Government’s White Paper drastically limited Jewish immigration into Palestine for the next five years just as the Jews in Europe were falling into the genocidal clutches of Nazi Germany.

In 1947, after one third of world Jewry had been wiped out, the United Nations voted to divide the land into a Jewish state and an Arab state.  Again, the Jews reluctantly accepted; the Arabs rejected.

The immediate response to the U.N. Partition Plan was the outbreak of yet more Arab aggression throughout Mandatory Palestine. The British still were responsible for law and order but behaved in ambivalent ways.  Some police even sided with the Arabs against the Jews. The Arab violence continued with ever greater ferocity but the Jewish defense organizations became better organized and resisted the attacks until they were able to take the battle to the Arab forces. Meanwhile, British troops left and the Mandate came to an end.

We now come to the period from 1948 when Israel was re-born as a Jewish State in its old homeland. And it is from this time that her borders again expanded and shrank, waxed and waned, according to relentless Arab aggression and decisions – some wise and some not so wise – made by successive Israeli leaders and their governments.

In May 1948, Israel’s independence was proclaimed and six Arab armies from Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Saudi Arabia invaded the new state with the intention of driving the Jews into the sea. During the War of Independence, the territory of the nascent Jewish state expanded as a direct consequence of the combined Arab assault. The coastal plain was secured, as was Upper Galilee. The Egyptians were driven out of the Negev desert in Israel’s south but the Jews were driven out of the ancient Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem.  

The Jordanians occupied all of Judea and Samaria. They occupied East Jerusalem where they desecrated and destroyed the ancient synagogues and homes, using the Jewish tombstones from the Mount of Olives as latrines for the Arab Legion. The Egyptians, in turn, occupied the Gaza Strip.

In 1956, Gamal Abdul Nasser overthrew the Egyptian government under General Neguib and fomented aggression against Israel in the form of terror attacks into Israel as far north as Rehovot from the Gaza Strip, and by blockading Israel’s maritime lifeline in the Gulf of Aqaba. Israeli forces finally retaliated by entering Gaza and the Sinai Peninsula as far as the Suez Canal.

This campaign to drive out the terrorists, deliver a blow to the Egyptian army, and raise the blockade, is known as the Sinai Campaign or the Hundred Hours War. British and French forces also invaded the Canal Zone in the hope of overthrowing Nasser who had nationalized the Suez Canal, which threatened their oil supplies.

However, Nasser was saved by President Eisenhower and his Secretary of State, Foster Dulles, who forced Israel to pull back from Sinai in March, 1957 leaving Nasser still in power. The French and British were also pressured to leave the Canal Zone and Nasser was able to create more mischief in the subsequent years. Indeed, Eisenhower stated many years later that forcing Israel to withdraw was a personal mistake he greatly regretted.

In May, 1967, Nasser again began proclaiming that he would lead the Arab world in a bid to destroy the Jewish State. He again blockaded the strategic Gulf of Aqaba – thus crippling Israel’s maritime trade with Asia – and ordered U-Thant, the U.N. Secretary General, to withdraw his buffer forces between Israel and Egypt from Sinai. He then moved Egyptian military forces into Sinai in clear contravention of earlier United Nations resolutions. At the same time, frenzied Arab mobs took to the streets of the Arab capitals calling for Israel’s destruction. 

Jordan’s King Hussein fell for the Egyptian dictator’s false assurances that his forces were already nearing Tel Aviv in hot pursuit of the retreating Israeli army. He foolishly ordered an attack along his long eastern frontier with Israel even though the Israeli Government assured him that they had no wish to go to war with Jordan. 

Syria too increased its relentless and unprovoked bombardment and aggression on Israeli farms and villages in northern Galilee from the Golan Heights. Military units from many Arab states, as far away as Sudan, eagerly announced their participation.

On June 5, 1967 Israel launched a pre-emptive strike against the air forces of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, destroying most of their squadrons on the ground. Egypt lost its air cover and was defeated again in Sinai; Syrian forces were driven off the strategic Golan Heights, and all of Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem were liberated. This was known as the Six-Day War and Israel had now expanded as a consequence of Arab aggression to its greatest size since the time of David and Solomon.

Anwar Sadat replaced Nasser, upon the death of the dictator, and launched what became known as the War of Attrition against Israel from 1969 to 1970. In time, however, the Egyptian forces were ground down after spectacular Israeli raids crippled the Egyptian army’s effectiveness. 

But Israel now had to grapple with growing PLO terror outside as well as within Israel. Yasser Arafat, who had launched his Soviet supported Palestine Liberation Organization in 1964, three years before Israel liberated Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), Gaza and the Golan Heights, fled with his PLO from Jordan after trying to set up a “state within a state.” 

King Hussein launched a violent crackdown on the PLO killing many thousands of Arabs who called themselves Palestinians. Arafat then occupied the Lebanese border with Israel and, again, set up a “state within a state.” He began launching horrific attacks against Israeli schoolchildren in northern Galilee from Lebanese territory. Meantime, Sadat secretly planned a joint attack by Egypt and Syria upon Israel on the holiest day in the Jewish religious calendar. It’s still debatable if the Israeli leaders knew of the pending attack but they decided to seek international favor by holding fire.

If they did have intelligence of a coming attack, it proved costly for on October 8, 1973, during Yom Kippur, the Egyptians and Syrians struck. The Egyptians initially drove the Israelis back in Sinai with great Israeli losses, and the Syrians poured across the Golan Heights to threaten northern Israel.

Eventually, the tide of battle turned. The Syrians were held on the Heights after heroic resistance from a small Israeli tank force. Israel pushed back the Syrians and came to within sight of the Syrian capital, Damascus. The Egyptian Third Army was surrounded by Israeli forces and Israeli units crossed the canal into Egypt and headed for the Egyptian capital, Cairo.

This was the greatest extent of Israeli territorial expansion and, again, was as a direct consequence of continuing Arab aggression.      

In 1973, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty and Israel withdrew from the entire Sinai Peninsula. Syria still remains obdurate and facilitates and aids the Hezbollah Islamist terrorists who now infest the Lebanese border adjoining northern Israel and have become a major threat to Israel. 

Hezbollah filled this vacuum after Israel – again taking enormous risks for peace – arbitrarily withdrew from its ten kilometer wide buffer zone that had kept terrorists from infiltrating Israeli territory.

Jordan too signed a peace treaty with Israel and relinquished territorial claims to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank). Despite ceaseless terror attacks, however, Israel has given the Arabs, who call themselves Palestinians, autonomy in large parts of the disputed territory. 

Israel is under intense pressure to give away the entire “West Bank” which will again reduce the width of its most heavily populated territory to a mere nine miles.

President Bush once remarked, as he flew with Ariel Sharon over the territory in a helicopter, “… why, in Texas we have driveways longer than that.”

It is clear that Israel must retain as much of her ancestral land as possible, whether it be in Judea, Samaria, or the Golan Heights, (Gaza is already lost) otherwise Israel will have insufficient strategic depth to absorb future Arab aggression. This is apart from the vital spiritual and historical importance and links of the territories to the reborn Jewish state and to Jewish history and patrimony.

With Iran and its Islamist allies encircling the Jewish state, it most certainly cannot survive in the pre-1967 boundaries that Israel’s earlier Foreign Minister, Abba Eban, once described as the “Auschwitz borders.”
 
Victor Sharpe is a writer on Jewish history and the Islamist-Israel conflict. He is the author of Volumes One and Two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state. This article first appeared as a chapter in Volume One. 

Who Really Supports Israel?

Jim Hutchens B&WCongress as a whole is predominately pro-Israel.    Some notable exceptions are the 54 Democrats who recently visited Israel with a blatantly pro-Palestinian agenda. Still most of our elected officials in Washington say they are pro-Israel. The question is, “What do these people mean when they say ‘I support Israel’?” Does saying “I support Israel” really make it so?

If they mean by supporting Israel that they endorse the Obama administration’s “Road Map to Peace” with its two-state solution and a divided Jerusalem to be the answer to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, then they don’t really support Israel. Rather, they support the basic myth that much of the land belongs to the Palestinians. The “Road Map to Peace” is pro-Palestinian, not pro-Israel.

To perpetuate the “Road Map to Peace” is to perpetuate a proven, dysfunctional foreign policy with respect to Israel and the Palestinians. It has many of the symptoms of a dysfunctional family which accepts conflict, misbehavior, denial of reality, and even tolerates abuse on the part of some members of the family. Inevitably, others in the family accommodate such actions which in turn continue to reinforce and enable dysfunctional behavior. The “Road Map to Peace” is based on fantasy, not fact – on the acceptance of fabrication, not reality.

For example, one of the main symptoms of a dysfunctional relationship is “denial.” The Obama administration’s “two state solution” is built on a refusal to acknowledge the Palestinian’s clear call and commitment to the extermination of Israel. Our leaders refuse to take them at their own word, hoping against hope they don’t really mean what they say. In fact, the bulk of Palestinians have indicated verbally and in writing since Israel’s inception that their goal is not peace, but the total destruction of the State of Israel. How many times do they have to say it before we believe they really mean it? To keep denying this is to insure future failure – a failure these so-called “land-for-peace plans” have produced time after time.

We have further enabled the failure by continually sending millions in aid to the Palestinian Authority, knowing full well the leadership has squirreled most of it away in Swiss banks. Congress recently approved a further $59 million dollar aid package to the office of Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud ‘Abbas. Some $43 million is earmarked for training and equipping Abbas’ personal security force. We know in our heart of hearts this money will be used to export violence against Israel, yet we continue this insane process of enabling Palestinian terrorism. The irrationality of supporting this Palestinian pathology is mind boggling.

For us to continue to push Israel toward this “land for peace” solution is to live in denial of its past failures. Israel’s reward for pulling out of south Lebanon was the rapid rise and resulting attacks by Hizbollah. Israel’s reward for “disengaging” from Gaza was the flourishing of Hamas, al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, Islamic Jihad and the omni present Al_Qaeda.

At this writing, Major General Amos Yadlin of the Israel Defense Force (IDF) department of Military Intelligence, has warned the Israeli cabinet of “an increase in the potential for instability” during this spring and summer. Both Hizbollah and Hamas have admitted as much. Yet the fiction persists that Israel can live in peace with these terrorists if only they will just give up a little more land.

Why do our leaders continue to press Israel to commit incremental suicide? Part of the answer may lie in the “Messianic Impulse” that both President Clinton and President Bush aggressively displayed and which President Obama seems committed to follow. That is, they want desperately to be credited as the architects of peace between Israel and the Palestinians – something that only the Messiah will bring. Until then, these terrorists Israel faces must be contained and neutralized. Which is to say, there will be no political or diplomatic solutions until there is a military solution. Peace terms can only be negotiated after terrorists are defeated.

There is, however, a more basic question President Obama should answer. “As a declared Christian how can he justify defying the revealed will of God by requiring Israel to give up land that God gave by covenant promise?” The continued commitment to the “Road Map to Peace” by this administration reveals two things. Either they don’t know of God’s covenant promises to Israel, or, they do know and yet have been influenced by Replacement Theology (i.e., the Church is the new Israel and God’s covenants with Jews is nullified because they rejected Christ).

We have some litmus tests for the candidate who receives our votes in 2010. At the top of the list is a willingness to renounce once and for all the “Road Map to Peace” and to discard our dysfunctional foreign policy regarding Israel. We want elected leaders who will “drop the illusion that Palestinians plan to accept Israel and seek a peaceful state alongside her.”

Netanyahu and the Daniel 9:27 covenant

danielBy Bill Koenig

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may be the leader who agrees to the final biblical pe

Anti-Israel boycotts flourish where ignorance prevails

bbcBy Victor Sharpe

I just returned from the UK where anti-Israel boycotts prevail.
 
Boycotts are highly effective and Israel is in peril of losing traditional markets for its many fine products if the anti-Israel boycotters prevail in their relentless campaigns. While visiting England I helped organize counter boycotts and participated in a pro-Israel scheme called Buycott, which urged all Christians, Jews and others who support embattled Israel to individually purchase all Israeli goods they find on retailers’ shelves. This is a highly effective tool to blunt the power of the boycotters and bigots.
 
In one British town, Brighton, Israel bashers have repeatedly targeted a small factory that allegedly produces weapons parts despite its repeated denials. According to the local newspaper, The Argus, the anti-Israel demonstrators accuse the local EDO factory of providing systems to Israel to be used in what they call, “military action by Israel in Palestine.” The local police stated that they would work with the demonstrators and, “do everything we can to work with organizers when they identify themselves to ensure they get an opportunity to get their message across.”
 
The excuse for the boycott and demonization of the Jewish state was the anniversary of Israel’s Operation Cast Lead, which was finally launched against the Hamas terror machine in Gaza after years of Israeli forbearance in the face of a  relentless Palestinian Arab missile barrage against Israeli civilians. It is, of course, instructive to note that the same Israel bashers, so concerned for the welfare of their beloved Palestinian Arabs, not once protested in the streets against Palestinian Arab aggression.     
 
The Israel boycotters, calling themselves, “Smash EDO,” have shown themselves to be anything but peaceful. According to the Argus, the demonstrators have previously attacked the factory site and “in June 2008 got into the car park, smashing windows and spraying graffiti, in a demonstration which ended in violent clashes with police with a dozen people injured.” This, of course, is typical of the ‘peace and justice’ crowd who exhibit anything but peace and have a most strange and distorted view of what justice means. Again, according to the Argus, “ … last January, 2009, the factory was broken into overnight by a group who caused damage estimated at £250,000. Eight people are due to stand trial later this year.”
 
The boycotters often repeat the claim that Israel killed 1,400 Palestinians in Operation Cast Lead in contrast with low Israeli casualties. But what the boycotters fail to mention is that the vast and overwhelming Arab casualty figures were comprised of Hamas and Islamic Jihad gunmen. The relatively few Arab civilian casualties in Gaza were primarily the result of the terrorists using their fellow Arabs as human shields; a despicable act and a crime against humanity. But that admission would be an inconvenient truth.    
 
British universities are a fertile breeding ground for the most virulent anti-Israel and anti-Jewish activities. The immense numbers of Arab and Muslim students in British campuses fuel a perverse culture that feeds and supports the misplaced acts of violence against factories and companies such as EDO in Brighton. In politically correct Britain, where diversity and multiculturalism is the new secular religion, the mantra is that “Britain is now a multi-faith society.”  Seemingly, the Queen as Defender of the Faith (meaning the Church of England) is all but forgotten. Islamic Sharia law is now more and more pervasive and Christianity receding. I wrote about this phenomenon in an earlier article titled: Less Steeples, more Minarets.
 
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is a media organ funded by British taxpayers. The tremendously influential BBC World Service is an arm of the British Foreign Office; it is essentially a state run media outlet. The World Service has been traditionally staffed by British Arabists who are no friends of the Zionist cause or of the reconstituted Jewish state. This has been the case for decades since not long after the time of T.E. Lawrence, who became grandiosely known as Lawrence of Arabia and who was reputed to have done much to destroy the occupying Ottoman Turkish control of the Middle East.
 
In fact it was a British officer and Christian Zionist, Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen, who after witnessing in 1910 an anti-Semitic pogrom in Odessa, went on to do far more to help the British and Anzac forces defeat Turkey than T.E. Lawrence ever did or ever could. Meinertzhaghen said that he was influenced by the “Divine promise that the Holy Land, the Land of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, will remain forever as Israel’s inheritance.”
 
The BBC often produces documentaries and current affairs programs that harm Israel’s image, either by the sins of commission or omission. I viewed a TV documentary on BBC 2 called “Lost Kingdoms of Africa,” which purported to show the historical links between the Ethiopian dynasty of kings, which was brought to an end in 1974, and the Old Testament’s King Solomon.
 
The presenter, Gus Casely-Hayford, committed a spectacular sin of omission by ignoring completely the millennia old existence of the black Jews of Ethiopia, the Beta Israel, who have now mostly returned home to Israel after centuries of yearning to be restored to the ancestral Jewish homeland. Though this Jewish community was significant proof of the possible link between King Solomon and the origins of the Ethiopian dynasty of kings, Mr. Casely-Hayford strangely mentioned not one word about this compelling link, even after visiting Gondar and the Tigre province of Ethiopia where the Beta Israel lived.
 
Listening to the local BBC current affairs programs was dispiriting. Time after time, it gave air time to those in British society who wanted to bash President Bush and bring ex-Prime Minster Blair before a “Human Rights” tribunal on charges of war crimes in Iraq. But what I found most alarming is the ignorance of world affairs by so many Brits whose only source of news and opinion on the radio is primarily from the state run BBC. There is practically no alternate viewpoint such as conservative Talk Radio provides here in the United States. This dunning down of the British public under the almost all pervasive dead hand of government is a salutary lesson for America. It is little wonder that Talk Radio remains under the threat of the so-called ‘Fairness Doctrine,’ a leftist doctrine that is anything but fair.
 
It is the type of society that currently afflicts Britain that can occur here in the U.S for it is that form of statism, which allows the Israel bashers and boycotters to proliferate and succeed. They are now trying to export their virulent hatred of everything to do with Israel by targeting American companies such as Costco for selling Israeli products. They must not be allowed to succeed here.
 
Victor Sharpe is a writer on Jewish history and the Islamist-Israel conflict. He is the author of several books and has just completed Volume Two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state.

Politicide-Volume Two

PoliticideBy Victor Sharpe, 155 pages

Just released! 

A compilation of published articles written by the author over a period of nearly ten years, detailing every aspect of the Arab and Islamist war against Israel and the relentless attempts by them to murder the Jewish State.

Politicide is the word originally coined by an Israeli statesman to describe just such an act of State murder.

Like the original book, this second volume provides an easily readable account of the Biblical and post-Biblical history of the Jewish state. It also outlines the refusal by the Islamists to accept the rebirth of Israel in its ancestral homeland: the main obstacle to a peaceful resolution of the Arab-Israel conflict. Both volumes provide an essential primer for all who wish to understand the conflict. The picture on front cover shows Hamas suicide bombing of Jerusalem bus in which 21 Israeli civilians perished.

To purchase this book go to: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/politicide—volume-two/8156424