Archive for February, 2010

Not one more Inch

By Victor Sharpe

“Let me tell you about land for peace.”

I remember once seeing a cartoon of a Native American chief looking wistfully towards the distant horizon where once his ancestral homeland lay. He was speaking to a stranger about the peace treaties he made that were all dishonored by American officials. The caption read: “Let me tell you about land for peace.”

With this in mind, and with the painful knowledge of Israel’s past “land for peace” fiascos, I penned an article, published in American Thinker, called “First Two-State Solution is 87 Years Old”. I felt it necessary to remind the world how, in 1921/22, the British Colonial Office had arbitrarily abrogated the promises made by Britain under the 1917 Balfour Declaration – of assisting the creation in Mandatory Palestine of a Jewish National Home. The British government broke its promise by tearing away all of the Mandate territory east of the River Jordan and giving it to the Arab Hashemite tribe. No Jews were allowed thereafter to live within the new Arab territory, which is now known as the Kingdom of Jordan. It became, and remains, judenrein, Arab style.

Now the modern Jewish state – ever obliged through international pressure to take risks by agreeing to “land for peace”, but never, ever receiving peace – is faced with the relentless continuation of the plan to divide yet again what remains of Eretz Yisrael, the Land of Israel, by now tearing away its Biblical and ancestral homeland. This is the very Biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria known throughout the world by its Jordanian Arab name, the West Bank. Land for peace and the two-state solution thus combine in a deathly embrace to force Israel into agreeing to permit within its borders the creation of an Arab terror state to be called Palestine: the 23rd Arab state.

In my work as a freelance writer and author, I am constantly forced to battle both Israel-bashers in the media as well as those Jews who are sadly willing to abandon their people’s spiritual and physical patrimony – the same foolish ones who support J Street and the so-called New Israel Fund (NIF). They do so in the deluded belief that by giving away the land, a full and lasting peace with the Muslim Arabs will descend upon embattled Israel like manna from heaven. But a reading of the Koran and the Hadith is all that is necessary to understand that Islam will never accept a non-Muslim state in land previously conquered in the name of Allah. Peace is nothing but a mirage in the desert.

It is necessary to retell the story of the redemption in June 1967, when Divine providence and Jewish patriotism combined to free Judea, Samaria, Gaza and the Golan Heights from alien occupation. But why must it be required to reiterate again and again that Israel did not capture land from another people? It always was the Jewish people’s very own land; and it returned to its native people.

How long must the patriots and lovers of Zion endure Israeli governments, which turn a blind eye to the creation of new Arab facts springing up on Judean and Samarian soil in the form of an Arab house here and a villa there? How long must they wait before a nationalist and patriotic Israeli government emerges that withstands foreign pressures; never again sending its police and troops, like thieves in the night, to destroy Jewish villages (I never use the pejorative English word, “settlements”) upon that same Judean and Samarian land?
Will Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu withstand such foreign pressure? Will he have learned the terrible lesson of the fraudulent Oslo Peace Accords, which predictably morphed into the Oslo War with its thousands of dead and maimed Jewish civilians. Will he have learned from his earlier abandonment of Hebron, the city of Judaism’s patriarchs and matriarchs, to the Muslim Arabs? Unless a miraculous change of heart occurs, I fear his self-imposed freeze on Jewish home building will remain in force, under vicious pressure from Barack Hussein Obama, while Arab housing continues feverishly concreting over the hills and valleys of the biblical heartland.

Nationalist and patriotic Israelis, along with Jewish and non-Jewish supporters in the Diaspora, may therefore see the new government, with its inclusion of Ehud “peace at any price” Barak as Defense Minister, continuing the lamentable policy of “land for peace”; whereby, Israel gives away its land but never receives peace; followed inevitably with the direst of all tragedies – a second “two-state solution.”

How long before the majority of politicians in the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) finally accept that Jews have returned permanently to their ancestral and Biblical land, a land which presently stretches from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River – a distance of less than 50 miles. How long before they realize that Israel must not be the only nation in the world perpetually forced to concede its homeland – the very special land given in eternal and divine Covenant by the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, King of Israel, Creator of the Universe – invisible and indivisible. How long before the cry is taken up: Not one more inch!

The threats are mounting against the Jewish state to an extent not seen since 1947. My own published books, volumes one and two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state, outline the relentless march of the enemies of Eretz Yisrael. Even today, a list of academics at American and overseas universities has been made available calling for a U.S. Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel and for a campaign called “End the Occupation.” http://www.endtheoccupation.org/groups.php.

Despite Israel no longer administering Gaza, and allowing for the fact that over 98% of the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians are now living under the control of the Palestinian Authority, the denizens of ‘lower learning’ throughout academia still falsely describe the Palestinian Arabs as living under Israeli occupation. Intellectual pursuits clearly do not confer intelligence.

The manner in which Israel may yet prevail is for it, therefore, to resist Arab and Islamist aggression from a position of relative territorial strength. Hebron has already been lost to those Arabs who call themselves Palestinians (save for a tiny and ever threatened Jewish enclave in the holy city). The Arabs have no interest in Israel’s survival; rather, the opposite. In return for a reduction in American support, if it has to come to that, Israel would be wise to keep Judea and Samaria. Keep the Golan. Even restore to itself parts of the Gaza Strip.
 
The physical and spiritual homeland is strength. Judaism, Zionism, Jerusalem – all are one and the same. Israeli ambassador (Ret.) Yoram Etinger, constantly issues demographic facts showing that the Jewish population is growing far faster in the territories than is the Arab population and that between the Mediterranean and the River Jordan the Arab population is vastly overstated by some two million inhabitants.

So will the Jewish state remain true to the Covenant? Will it no longer concede one inch of covenanted land? Will that resolve extend to an undivided Jerusalem? Will there be a firm and unyielding rejection of yet another two-state solution? Will the people finally say no to those elites who betrayed their trust by giving away the precious homeland in return for the bauble known as the Oslo Peace Prize? The questions remain, but if Israel continues to hark unto the siren calls of a fraudulent peace, it may yet usher in another Final Solution for the remnant of the Jewish people and for the reconstituted Jewish state.

Remember, it is always infinitely preferable to fight from a position of territorial strength, buoyed by spiritual certitude, than to be forced to battle for survival after yet more of the homeland has been given away in return for nothing.
Remember the words of that Native American.

Victor Sharpe is a freelance writer and author of several books including volumes one and two of Politicide – The attempted murder of the Jewish state.

PrintFriendly

The Changing Borders of Israel

Victor SharpeBy Victor Sharpe
 
From the earliest Biblical days the boundaries of the ancestral Jewish homeland expanded and shrank time and time again. But even during periods when the homeland was under alien occupation, the Jews managed to sustain, in whatever numbers they could, a physical presence. For Jews in the Diaspora the land remained forever with them as an unbroken bond.

The first Jew, Abraham, was called by God to leave Haran and travel to the Promised Land around 2000 BC. His journey began when he first left Ur (situated in today’s Iraq) and traveled to Haran and thence to Biblical Shechem in today’s Nablus, now a center of Arab terrorism in the Palestinian Authority territories.

Abraham journeyed onto Egypt because of famine throughout the land then known as Canaan. But before he left, he purchased a plot of land in Hebron from a Hittite where today the Cave of Machpela exists as the traditional burial ground of Abraham, his son Isaac, and grandson Jacob along with their wives, Sarah, Rebecca and Leah. These are the Jewish Patriarchs and Matriarchs of the Bible.

Concurrent draughts and famine forced Abraham’s descendants to find sanctuary and relief in Egypt. The Biblical story tells us of the Jewish nation’s eventual slavery by successive Pharaohs and the miraculous Exodus under the leader and lawgiver, Moses, who brought them back to the Promised Land around 1,225 BC. From this time onwards we see how many times the boundaries of the Jewish homeland have waxed and waned up unto the present day.

We should start at the borders of the land after its conquest by the Children of Israel under their general, Joshua, and its distribution amongst the Twelve Tribes. 

The tribes, which traced their individual history back to the sons of Jacob, were Manasseh, Ephraim, Asher, Naphtali, Zebulon, Issachar, Dan, Benjamin, Judah and Simeon. They received territory in what consists today of Israel along with Judea and Samaria (the West Bank). In addition, the tribes of Manasseh, Gad and Reuben also received vast areas of land east of the River Jordan, which today form part of the Hashemite Arab Kingdom of Jordan in which no Jews are permitted to live. Much of the territory adjoining the coastline was occupied in the south by the Philistines, known as the Sea Peoples, who it is believed originated in Crete. In the north the Phoenicians occupied the maritime lands.

Around 1000-925 BC, the subsequent Kingdoms of David and his son, Solomon, expanded their borders to encompass the Mediterranean (the Great Sea) coastline from central Sinai as far north as present day Akko, (Acre).  In the east, the borders extended to include present day Amman, the capital of Jordan, and Damascus in Syria. Indeed much of present day Syria was included within the borders of the Biblical Jewish kingdom.

In the south, the territory reached as far as today’s Eilat at the head of the modern day Gulf of Aqaba, but around 850 BC civil war broke out and the land was divided into two separate kingdoms, with Judah in the south and Israel in the north. The concomitant weakness allowed Moab and Edom to break away and a powerful new Empire, Assyria, in what is present day Iraq, began to threaten Israel from the north and east. 

I will bring a nation upon you from afar…it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation; a nation whose language you know not nor what they say.  And they will eat up your harvest and your bread, which your sons and daughters should eat; they will eat your flocks and your herds; they will  eat up your vines and your fig trees; they will impoverish your walled cities,  in which you trust, with the sword.  Nevertheless, I will not make a full end with you. Jeremiah 6, 17-18

Both Israel and Judah had shrunk to mere shadows of the glory they once were. As the Bible recounts, Israel finally succumbed to the awesome power of Assyria in 722 BC and her people were lost to history and passed into legend as the ten lost tribes of Israel.

Judah held on for over a hundred years but a new Empire arose, Babylon, which defeated its Assyrian rival and eventually moved against Judah. After a long siege, the Babylonians broke into Jerusalem, sacked the Temple and carried off the Jews to Babylon in 586 BC. 

In turn, Babylon, the greatest city of the ancient world, was conquered by the rising empire of Persia. Its king, Cyrus, proclaimed in 539 BC that the Jewish exiles could return to their ancient land and the cry was heard, “Return to Zion! Rebuild the Land of Israel.”

Not all the Jews returned. Many remained in Babylon and their descendants lived there for 2,500 years until the middle of the twentieth century, when they escaped from the cruel oppression of the Iraqi Arab government during Operation Ezra and Nehemiah – after the reconstituted State of Israel came into existence in 1948. But let us return to what the earlier Zionists of their day achieved when some 50,000 Jews left Babylon to restore their homeland.

In time, the Second Temple was built in Jerusalem and the land, now again named Judah, prospered. Unlike the early Persian kings, the later ones became more and more dictatorial. Persia was finally conquered by Greece.

Alexander the Great was particularly kind to his Jewish subjects and many Jews fought under his banner as he carved out his Greek empire. But, again, after his death, Alexander’s Ptolemaic Egyptian and Seleucid Syrian successors became increasingly difficult to live under.  The Jewish homeland fell under the control of the Hellenized King of Syria, Antiochus IV. He thought he was a god and called himself Epiphanes, which means “the manifest of God.” Antiochus demanded that the Jews worship him, give up their religion, and cease to keep the Sabbath holy. His cruelty and madness eventually forced the revolt of the heroic Jewish priest, Mattathias, and his five sons who are enshrined in history as the Maccabees.         

Against overwhelming odds, the revolt began in 167 BC and fierce battles were fought throughout Israel, Judea and Samaria. During the war, Syrian/Greek armies were thrown against the Jewish rebels but were defeated by the third son of Mattathias, Judah, who emerged as an extraordinary military leader and who went on to victories at Emmaus, Beth-Horon, and Beth-Zur. On the twenty-fifth day of the Hebrew month of Kislev, 165 BC, which usually falls in the month of December, the Maccabees, which means “hammerers,” liberated and restored the Temple – an act celebrated to this day during the Jewish festival of lights – Hanukah. 

The successor to the Maccabees, the Hasmonean dynasty extended the boundaries of Israel again to include territory almost reaching Damascus in the north and including large areas again of modern day Jordan in the east and as far southwest as Gaza and much of the northern coastline of Sinai.

In 63 BC, during rival claims to the Hasmonean throne, one of the claimants foolishly invited the looming empire of Rome to intercede on his behalf.  Rome, ever anxious to spread its influence, sent its general, Pompey, with an army to besiege Jerusalem and after three months the city fell.  Rome now effectively occupied the Jewish homeland, which in time became the Roman Province of Judea.

It is instructive to note that at the time of Pompey’s invasion there were three million Jews in Judea. Another four million lived in other parts of the Roman Empire and since the total population of the entire empire was no more than 70,000,000, one out of every ten Romans was of the Jewish faith. Jews today now number a mere thirteen million people out of a world population rapidly exceeding six billion. Over half of the world Jewish population now live in Israel.

Like the earlier Persian and Greek kings, the Roman procurators and governors inflicted onerous taxes on the people and began to dictate how their religion was to be practiced. The Jews finally rose up against the Roman legions in 66-73 AD. 

The Roman emperor Vespasian ordered his son, Titus, to finally re-conquer Judea and besiege its capital, Jerusalem. After an epic struggle with the defenders, Titus and his legions destroyed the Temple. The revolt continued until the Jewish defenders on the mountaintop fortress of Masada committed mass suicide rather than be taken as captive slaves to Rome.

Despite enormous casualties (estimates of 1,000,000 Jews killed) and countless numbers sent into slavery, the Jewish presence still remained strong in the homeland and a Second Revolt broke out against Roman occupation in 135 AD. The Jews fought under their charismatic leader, Shimon Bar-Kochba and defeated successive Roman legions sent against them. They restored their independence for three short years.

The Roman Emperor, Hadrian, finally crushed Judea and renamed the land Philistia, later Syria-Palaestina, finally known as Palestine, after the Philistines who had dominated parts of the Mediterranean coastline. This was a calculated insult to the Jews whose ancient enemy had been the Philistines. Palestine remained the geographical name of the area until modern times though it was never an independent state; certainly never an independent Arab state. 

However, even after Jewish independence in its Biblical and ancestral homeland was obliterated in name and deed, the Jews still managed to remain throughout much of the territories. Jerusalem had been converted into a pagan city named Aeolia Capitolina in which was erected a giant statue of the pagan god, Jupiter, in place of the Temple to the One God.

Though the land was lost to Jewish independence for the next two thousand years, Jews continued to yearn for a return to the Promised Land  and “Zion” the mountain that became a symbol for Jerusalem. 

In the seventh century, the Arabs invaded the homeland under the new banner of Islam. For successive periods after Hadrian’s bloody conquest, different alien invaders occupied the land including Byzantines, Persians, Arabs, Seljuks, Crusaders, Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, and the British. 

Though Jews remained in whatever numbers they could maintain, there was always a steady, albeit limited, infusion of Jews into the homeland fleeing persecution in Europe or from the Islamic world. For instance, during the Middle Ages, many Jewish rabbis and their disciples re-entered the land.  Larger numbers began to return in the mid-nineteenth century. Neglected and barren land was purchased at great cost from absentee landlords and agricultural schools and communities began to form under the Ottoman occupation. 

On November 2, 1917, Jewish hopes for a restored and independent homeland were raised by the British Foreign Minister, Lord Balfour, in what became known as the Balfour Declaration. Great Britain soon conquered all of Ottoman occupied Palestine and, after the First World War, the League of Nations gave Britain control of the Holy Land with a mandate to effect Jewish self-government and a national homeland. Shortly after Britain obtained the Mandate, she tore away all of the land east of the River Jordan and gave it to the Arab Hashemite tribe; thus denying Jewish rights in four fifths of the territory.

Most Arab leaders, at that time, acknowledged that they had no historical claims upon the Land of Israel. The area had never been home to an independent Arab state called “Palestine,” and even when it had come under the control of the invading Arab Empire in the seventh century, it had always remained an unimportant backwater. Since 1517, the land had been occupied by the non-Arab Turks.

In 1936, the British Peel Commission stated clearly that “if the Arabs were given independence in the enormous territories of the Middle East, they were willing to give “little Palestine” to the Jews.”  Little Palestine was now reduced to the one fifth of the Mandate or the tiny territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan – a mere 50 miles at its widest.

Arab intransigence grew as the years went by. In the end, the British gave up the struggle to keep the peace and in 1947 referred the matter to the United Nations, which voted to divide the much reduced area yet again into two states: one Arab, one Jewish. 

It would be wise for readers to purchase or obtain from their local libraries the remarkably clear and graphic books published by Sir Martin Gilbert, the official biographer of Sir Winston Churchill and now a Fellow at Merton College, Oxford. The two books are The Arab-Israel Conflict, Its History in Maps, and the Jewish History Atlas.

From 1917 to 1947, many different suggestions were offered for the boundaries of the geographical entity known as Palestine. Britain’s Colonial Office suggested plans that were to become inimical to the hoped for borders proposed by the Zionist Organization representing the aspirations of the Jews in the Diaspora. 

During the 1920s and 1930s, the Arabs rioted against the British Mandatory Authorities and, in the ensuing violence, many Jews were murdered.  In 1929, the ancient Jewish community in Hebron was slaughtered by their Arab neighbors and twenty three defenseless Jews were slaughtered and dismembered in one house alone. 

In 1936, an organized Arab campaign broke out and bands of armed Arabs inflicted heavy casualties on the British forces. Eighty Jews, mostly civilians, had been killed by the time the Arabs called off their “intifada” on October 12, 1936.

Britain tried to appease the Arabs by appointing a Royal Commission to look into the Mandate. The Peel Commission recommended a Jewish state and an Arab state with a British controlled corridor from Jaffa to Jerusalem.  The Jews reluctantly accepted; the Arabs totally rejected.

In 1937 more Arab rioting took place with yet more Jewish and Arab casualties. Many of the Arabs who sought peace and coexistence were murdered by their fellow Arabs because they were considered “collaborators” with the Jews. This same murderous activity continues in today’s Palestinian Authority and in Hamas occupied Gaza.

The Second World War broke out on September 3, 1939 and Britain, more than ever, needed the oil from the Arab Middle East to survive. Again, it chose to appease the Arabs and in 1940 began restricting Jewish land purchases. Before that, the infamous 1939 British Government’s White Paper drastically limited Jewish immigration into Palestine for the next five years just as the Jews in Europe were falling into the genocidal clutches of Nazi Germany.

In 1947, after one third of world Jewry had been wiped out, the United Nations voted to divide the land into a Jewish state and an Arab state.  Again, the Jews reluctantly accepted; the Arabs rejected.

The immediate response to the U.N. Partition Plan was the outbreak of yet more Arab aggression throughout Mandatory Palestine. The British still were responsible for law and order but behaved in ambivalent ways.  Some police even sided with the Arabs against the Jews. The Arab violence continued with ever greater ferocity but the Jewish defense organizations became better organized and resisted the attacks until they were able to take the battle to the Arab forces. Meanwhile, British troops left and the Mandate came to an end.

We now come to the period from 1948 when Israel was re-born as a Jewish State in its old homeland. And it is from this time that her borders again expanded and shrank, waxed and waned, according to relentless Arab aggression and decisions – some wise and some not so wise – made by successive Israeli leaders and their governments.

In May 1948, Israel’s independence was proclaimed and six Arab armies from Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Saudi Arabia invaded the new state with the intention of driving the Jews into the sea. During the War of Independence, the territory of the nascent Jewish state expanded as a direct consequence of the combined Arab assault. The coastal plain was secured, as was Upper Galilee. The Egyptians were driven out of the Negev desert in Israel’s south but the Jews were driven out of the ancient Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem.  

The Jordanians occupied all of Judea and Samaria. They occupied East Jerusalem where they desecrated and destroyed the ancient synagogues and homes, using the Jewish tombstones from the Mount of Olives as latrines for the Arab Legion. The Egyptians, in turn, occupied the Gaza Strip.

In 1956, Gamal Abdul Nasser overthrew the Egyptian government under General Neguib and fomented aggression against Israel in the form of terror attacks into Israel as far north as Rehovot from the Gaza Strip, and by blockading Israel’s maritime lifeline in the Gulf of Aqaba. Israeli forces finally retaliated by entering Gaza and the Sinai Peninsula as far as the Suez Canal.

This campaign to drive out the terrorists, deliver a blow to the Egyptian army, and raise the blockade, is known as the Sinai Campaign or the Hundred Hours War. British and French forces also invaded the Canal Zone in the hope of overthrowing Nasser who had nationalized the Suez Canal, which threatened their oil supplies.

However, Nasser was saved by President Eisenhower and his Secretary of State, Foster Dulles, who forced Israel to pull back from Sinai in March, 1957 leaving Nasser still in power. The French and British were also pressured to leave the Canal Zone and Nasser was able to create more mischief in the subsequent years. Indeed, Eisenhower stated many years later that forcing Israel to withdraw was a personal mistake he greatly regretted.

In May, 1967, Nasser again began proclaiming that he would lead the Arab world in a bid to destroy the Jewish State. He again blockaded the strategic Gulf of Aqaba – thus crippling Israel’s maritime trade with Asia – and ordered U-Thant, the U.N. Secretary General, to withdraw his buffer forces between Israel and Egypt from Sinai. He then moved Egyptian military forces into Sinai in clear contravention of earlier United Nations resolutions. At the same time, frenzied Arab mobs took to the streets of the Arab capitals calling for Israel’s destruction. 

Jordan’s King Hussein fell for the Egyptian dictator’s false assurances that his forces were already nearing Tel Aviv in hot pursuit of the retreating Israeli army. He foolishly ordered an attack along his long eastern frontier with Israel even though the Israeli Government assured him that they had no wish to go to war with Jordan. 

Syria too increased its relentless and unprovoked bombardment and aggression on Israeli farms and villages in northern Galilee from the Golan Heights. Military units from many Arab states, as far away as Sudan, eagerly announced their participation.

On June 5, 1967 Israel launched a pre-emptive strike against the air forces of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, destroying most of their squadrons on the ground. Egypt lost its air cover and was defeated again in Sinai; Syrian forces were driven off the strategic Golan Heights, and all of Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem were liberated. This was known as the Six-Day War and Israel had now expanded as a consequence of Arab aggression to its greatest size since the time of David and Solomon.

Anwar Sadat replaced Nasser, upon the death of the dictator, and launched what became known as the War of Attrition against Israel from 1969 to 1970. In time, however, the Egyptian forces were ground down after spectacular Israeli raids crippled the Egyptian army’s effectiveness. 

But Israel now had to grapple with growing PLO terror outside as well as within Israel. Yasser Arafat, who had launched his Soviet supported Palestine Liberation Organization in 1964, three years before Israel liberated Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), Gaza and the Golan Heights, fled with his PLO from Jordan after trying to set up a “state within a state.” 

King Hussein launched a violent crackdown on the PLO killing many thousands of Arabs who called themselves Palestinians. Arafat then occupied the Lebanese border with Israel and, again, set up a “state within a state.” He began launching horrific attacks against Israeli schoolchildren in northern Galilee from Lebanese territory. Meantime, Sadat secretly planned a joint attack by Egypt and Syria upon Israel on the holiest day in the Jewish religious calendar. It’s still debatable if the Israeli leaders knew of the pending attack but they decided to seek international favor by holding fire.

If they did have intelligence of a coming attack, it proved costly for on October 8, 1973, during Yom Kippur, the Egyptians and Syrians struck. The Egyptians initially drove the Israelis back in Sinai with great Israeli losses, and the Syrians poured across the Golan Heights to threaten northern Israel.

Eventually, the tide of battle turned. The Syrians were held on the Heights after heroic resistance from a small Israeli tank force. Israel pushed back the Syrians and came to within sight of the Syrian capital, Damascus. The Egyptian Third Army was surrounded by Israeli forces and Israeli units crossed the canal into Egypt and headed for the Egyptian capital, Cairo.

This was the greatest extent of Israeli territorial expansion and, again, was as a direct consequence of continuing Arab aggression.      

In 1973, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty and Israel withdrew from the entire Sinai Peninsula. Syria still remains obdurate and facilitates and aids the Hezbollah Islamist terrorists who now infest the Lebanese border adjoining northern Israel and have become a major threat to Israel. 

Hezbollah filled this vacuum after Israel – again taking enormous risks for peace – arbitrarily withdrew from its ten kilometer wide buffer zone that had kept terrorists from infiltrating Israeli territory.

Jordan too signed a peace treaty with Israel and relinquished territorial claims to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank). Despite ceaseless terror attacks, however, Israel has given the Arabs, who call themselves Palestinians, autonomy in large parts of the disputed territory. 

Israel is under intense pressure to give away the entire “West Bank” which will again reduce the width of its most heavily populated territory to a mere nine miles.

President Bush once remarked, as he flew with Ariel Sharon over the territory in a helicopter, “… why, in Texas we have driveways longer than that.”

It is clear that Israel must retain as much of her ancestral land as possible, whether it be in Judea, Samaria, or the Golan Heights, (Gaza is already lost) otherwise Israel will have insufficient strategic depth to absorb future Arab aggression. This is apart from the vital spiritual and historical importance and links of the territories to the reborn Jewish state and to Jewish history and patrimony.

With Iran and its Islamist allies encircling the Jewish state, it most certainly cannot survive in the pre-1967 boundaries that Israel’s earlier Foreign Minister, Abba Eban, once described as the “Auschwitz borders.”
 
Victor Sharpe is a writer on Jewish history and the Islamist-Israel conflict. He is the author of Volumes One and Two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state. This article first appeared as a chapter in Volume One. 

PrintFriendly

Who Really Supports Israel?

Jim Hutchens B&WCongress as a whole is predominately pro-Israel.    Some notable exceptions are the 54 Democrats who recently visited Israel with a blatantly pro-Palestinian agenda. Still most of our elected officials in Washington say they are pro-Israel. The question is, “What do these people mean when they say ‘I support Israel’?” Does saying “I support Israel” really make it so?

If they mean by supporting Israel that they endorse the Obama administration’s “Road Map to Peace” with its two-state solution and a divided Jerusalem to be the answer to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, then they don’t really support Israel. Rather, they support the basic myth that much of the land belongs to the Palestinians. The “Road Map to Peace” is pro-Palestinian, not pro-Israel.

To perpetuate the “Road Map to Peace” is to perpetuate a proven, dysfunctional foreign policy with respect to Israel and the Palestinians. It has many of the symptoms of a dysfunctional family which accepts conflict, misbehavior, denial of reality, and even tolerates abuse on the part of some members of the family. Inevitably, others in the family accommodate such actions which in turn continue to reinforce and enable dysfunctional behavior. The “Road Map to Peace” is based on fantasy, not fact – on the acceptance of fabrication, not reality.

For example, one of the main symptoms of a dysfunctional relationship is “denial.” The Obama administration’s “two state solution” is built on a refusal to acknowledge the Palestinian’s clear call and commitment to the extermination of Israel. Our leaders refuse to take them at their own word, hoping against hope they don’t really mean what they say. In fact, the bulk of Palestinians have indicated verbally and in writing since Israel’s inception that their goal is not peace, but the total destruction of the State of Israel. How many times do they have to say it before we believe they really mean it? To keep denying this is to insure future failure – a failure these so-called “land-for-peace plans” have produced time after time.

We have further enabled the failure by continually sending millions in aid to the Palestinian Authority, knowing full well the leadership has squirreled most of it away in Swiss banks. Congress recently approved a further $59 million dollar aid package to the office of Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud ‘Abbas. Some $43 million is earmarked for training and equipping Abbas’ personal security force. We know in our heart of hearts this money will be used to export violence against Israel, yet we continue this insane process of enabling Palestinian terrorism. The irrationality of supporting this Palestinian pathology is mind boggling.

For us to continue to push Israel toward this “land for peace” solution is to live in denial of its past failures. Israel’s reward for pulling out of south Lebanon was the rapid rise and resulting attacks by Hizbollah. Israel’s reward for “disengaging” from Gaza was the flourishing of Hamas, al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, Islamic Jihad and the omni present Al_Qaeda.

At this writing, Major General Amos Yadlin of the Israel Defense Force (IDF) department of Military Intelligence, has warned the Israeli cabinet of “an increase in the potential for instability” during this spring and summer. Both Hizbollah and Hamas have admitted as much. Yet the fiction persists that Israel can live in peace with these terrorists if only they will just give up a little more land.

Why do our leaders continue to press Israel to commit incremental suicide? Part of the answer may lie in the “Messianic Impulse” that both President Clinton and President Bush aggressively displayed and which President Obama seems committed to follow. That is, they want desperately to be credited as the architects of peace between Israel and the Palestinians – something that only the Messiah will bring. Until then, these terrorists Israel faces must be contained and neutralized. Which is to say, there will be no political or diplomatic solutions until there is a military solution. Peace terms can only be negotiated after terrorists are defeated.

There is, however, a more basic question President Obama should answer. “As a declared Christian how can he justify defying the revealed will of God by requiring Israel to give up land that God gave by covenant promise?” The continued commitment to the “Road Map to Peace” by this administration reveals two things. Either they don’t know of God’s covenant promises to Israel, or, they do know and yet have been influenced by Replacement Theology (i.e., the Church is the new Israel and God’s covenants with Jews is nullified because they rejected Christ).

We have some litmus tests for the candidate who receives our votes in 2010. At the top of the list is a willingness to renounce once and for all the “Road Map to Peace” and to discard our dysfunctional foreign policy regarding Israel. We want elected leaders who will “drop the illusion that Palestinians plan to accept Israel and seek a peaceful state alongside her.”

PrintFriendly

Netanyahu and the Daniel 9:27 covenant

danielBy Bill Koenig

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may be the leader who agrees to the final biblical pe

PrintFriendly

Anti-Israel boycotts flourish where ignorance prevails

bbcBy Victor Sharpe

I just returned from the UK where anti-Israel boycotts prevail.
 
Boycotts are highly effective and Israel is in peril of losing traditional markets for its many fine products if the anti-Israel boycotters prevail in their relentless campaigns. While visiting England I helped organize counter boycotts and participated in a pro-Israel scheme called Buycott, which urged all Christians, Jews and others who support embattled Israel to individually purchase all Israeli goods they find on retailers’ shelves. This is a highly effective tool to blunt the power of the boycotters and bigots.
 
In one British town, Brighton, Israel bashers have repeatedly targeted a small factory that allegedly produces weapons parts despite its repeated denials. According to the local newspaper, The Argus, the anti-Israel demonstrators accuse the local EDO factory of providing systems to Israel to be used in what they call, “military action by Israel in Palestine.” The local police stated that they would work with the demonstrators and, “do everything we can to work with organizers when they identify themselves to ensure they get an opportunity to get their message across.”
 
The excuse for the boycott and demonization of the Jewish state was the anniversary of Israel’s Operation Cast Lead, which was finally launched against the Hamas terror machine in Gaza after years of Israeli forbearance in the face of a  relentless Palestinian Arab missile barrage against Israeli civilians. It is, of course, instructive to note that the same Israel bashers, so concerned for the welfare of their beloved Palestinian Arabs, not once protested in the streets against Palestinian Arab aggression.     
 
The Israel boycotters, calling themselves, “Smash EDO,” have shown themselves to be anything but peaceful. According to the Argus, the demonstrators have previously attacked the factory site and “in June 2008 got into the car park, smashing windows and spraying graffiti, in a demonstration which ended in violent clashes with police with a dozen people injured.” This, of course, is typical of the ‘peace and justice’ crowd who exhibit anything but peace and have a most strange and distorted view of what justice means. Again, according to the Argus, “ … last January, 2009, the factory was broken into overnight by a group who caused damage estimated at £250,000. Eight people are due to stand trial later this year.”
 
The boycotters often repeat the claim that Israel killed 1,400 Palestinians in Operation Cast Lead in contrast with low Israeli casualties. But what the boycotters fail to mention is that the vast and overwhelming Arab casualty figures were comprised of Hamas and Islamic Jihad gunmen. The relatively few Arab civilian casualties in Gaza were primarily the result of the terrorists using their fellow Arabs as human shields; a despicable act and a crime against humanity. But that admission would be an inconvenient truth.    
 
British universities are a fertile breeding ground for the most virulent anti-Israel and anti-Jewish activities. The immense numbers of Arab and Muslim students in British campuses fuel a perverse culture that feeds and supports the misplaced acts of violence against factories and companies such as EDO in Brighton. In politically correct Britain, where diversity and multiculturalism is the new secular religion, the mantra is that “Britain is now a multi-faith society.”  Seemingly, the Queen as Defender of the Faith (meaning the Church of England) is all but forgotten. Islamic Sharia law is now more and more pervasive and Christianity receding. I wrote about this phenomenon in an earlier article titled: Less Steeples, more Minarets.
 
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is a media organ funded by British taxpayers. The tremendously influential BBC World Service is an arm of the British Foreign Office; it is essentially a state run media outlet. The World Service has been traditionally staffed by British Arabists who are no friends of the Zionist cause or of the reconstituted Jewish state. This has been the case for decades since not long after the time of T.E. Lawrence, who became grandiosely known as Lawrence of Arabia and who was reputed to have done much to destroy the occupying Ottoman Turkish control of the Middle East.
 
In fact it was a British officer and Christian Zionist, Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen, who after witnessing in 1910 an anti-Semitic pogrom in Odessa, went on to do far more to help the British and Anzac forces defeat Turkey than T.E. Lawrence ever did or ever could. Meinertzhaghen said that he was influenced by the “Divine promise that the Holy Land, the Land of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, will remain forever as Israel’s inheritance.”
 
The BBC often produces documentaries and current affairs programs that harm Israel’s image, either by the sins of commission or omission. I viewed a TV documentary on BBC 2 called “Lost Kingdoms of Africa,” which purported to show the historical links between the Ethiopian dynasty of kings, which was brought to an end in 1974, and the Old Testament’s King Solomon.
 
The presenter, Gus Casely-Hayford, committed a spectacular sin of omission by ignoring completely the millennia old existence of the black Jews of Ethiopia, the Beta Israel, who have now mostly returned home to Israel after centuries of yearning to be restored to the ancestral Jewish homeland. Though this Jewish community was significant proof of the possible link between King Solomon and the origins of the Ethiopian dynasty of kings, Mr. Casely-Hayford strangely mentioned not one word about this compelling link, even after visiting Gondar and the Tigre province of Ethiopia where the Beta Israel lived.
 
Listening to the local BBC current affairs programs was dispiriting. Time after time, it gave air time to those in British society who wanted to bash President Bush and bring ex-Prime Minster Blair before a “Human Rights” tribunal on charges of war crimes in Iraq. But what I found most alarming is the ignorance of world affairs by so many Brits whose only source of news and opinion on the radio is primarily from the state run BBC. There is practically no alternate viewpoint such as conservative Talk Radio provides here in the United States. This dunning down of the British public under the almost all pervasive dead hand of government is a salutary lesson for America. It is little wonder that Talk Radio remains under the threat of the so-called ‘Fairness Doctrine,’ a leftist doctrine that is anything but fair.
 
It is the type of society that currently afflicts Britain that can occur here in the U.S for it is that form of statism, which allows the Israel bashers and boycotters to proliferate and succeed. They are now trying to export their virulent hatred of everything to do with Israel by targeting American companies such as Costco for selling Israeli products. They must not be allowed to succeed here.
 
Victor Sharpe is a writer on Jewish history and the Islamist-Israel conflict. He is the author of several books and has just completed Volume Two of Politicide: The attempted murder of the Jewish state.

PrintFriendly